AutoGrant

AutoGrant for social-impact companies

Find funding that fits both the public benefit and the business.

AutoGrant helps mission-led companies separate real opportunities from grants that exclude for-profit applicants, then evaluate the technical, public-benefit, partnership, evidence, and delivery conditions required to compete.

Applicant path checkIllustrative — sample data
  • Directly eligible
  • Eligible as a partner, vendor, subrecipient, or subcontractor
  • Relevant to the program but not an eligible applicant
The applicant path is confirmed before the company spends time writing.
  • Legitimate applicant path first

    Directly eligible, partner role, or no-go — confirmed before anyone writes.

  • No manufactured workarounds

    Partnerships must be legitimate and consistent with funder and procurement rules.

  • Leadership decision recorded

    The pursue-or-pass call is documented before drafting begins.

  • Human-authorized submission

    Final commitments and authorization stay with people.

Eligibility

Why eligibility is not obvious

Many grants are written for nonprofits, public agencies, universities, tribal entities, or specific small-business mechanisms. A company may be:

AutoGrant should identify the legitimate applicant path before the company spends time writing or attempts to create an artificial structure.

  • Directly eligible
  • Eligible only under a research or innovation mechanism
  • Eligible as a partner, vendor, subrecipient, or subcontractor
  • Relevant to the program but not an eligible applicant
  • Technically eligible but strategically misaligned
  • Better served by revenue, investment, procurement, or partnership instead

Approved context

Company impact profile

Approved context can include:

  • Mission and public-benefit thesis
  • Product or service
  • Target population and geography
  • Outcomes and impact evidence
  • Business model and customers
  • Technical or service-delivery capacity
  • Partnerships
  • Research and innovation
  • Corporate structure and eligibility attributes
  • Financial and sustainability model
  • Intellectual property
  • Prior awards and public-sector work
  • Strategic priorities and exclusions

Company context stays governed.

AI Judge

Six questions AI Judge puts to every opportunity

Applicant eligibility

Does the program permit a for-profit applicant? If not, is there a legitimate partner role consistent with the program and procurement rules?

Public-benefit fit

Does the proposed work advance the public outcome the funder is trying to create, or is it primarily a commercial sale?

Evidence and impact

Can the company support the need, approach, outcomes, equity, evaluation, and public value with credible evidence?

Delivery and financial capacity

Can the company perform, report, manage costs, sustain the work, and accept restrictions or cost-sharing?

Competitive position

Does the company bring technology, speed, access, cost, evidence, partnerships, or a delivery model that is relevant to the program?

Strategic value

Does the award advance product, evidence, market access, partnerships, or public impact—or impose obligations that distort the business?

Example verdict

What an honest read looks like

AI Judge verdictIllustrative example — sample data

Do not pursue directly

The program funds nonprofit and local-government applicants only. The company may be relevant as a technology partner, but the opportunity should proceed only through a legitimate eligible lead with a clear community-delivery role—not as a workaround for commercial sales.

A no-go or partner-path recommendation is a valuable outcome.

Workflow

From impact thesis to preserved obligations

  1. Define the company’s impact, product, evidence, and strategy.

  2. Organize public, research, innovation, corporate, and partnership opportunities.

  3. Confirm applicant path and restrictions.

  4. Evaluate public-benefit fit, evidence, delivery, financial implications, competition, and strategic value.

  5. Record the leadership decision.

  6. Extract requirements and partner dependencies.

  7. Draft from verified company and impact evidence.

  8. Review technical, impact, business, financial, legal, and partnership commitments.

  9. Require final authorization.

  10. Preserve award obligations, results, and future pathways.

Human + AI

Human responsibilities

People retain responsibility for:

  • Corporate and applicant eligibility
  • Legal structure
  • Partnership and procurement integrity
  • Technical and impact claims
  • Commercial and financial decisions
  • Intellectual property
  • Commercialization and strategy
  • Final commitments and authorization

Ways to get AutoGrant

Platform or Enterprise

AutoGrant Platform

Platform may fit an impact company with a focused non-dilutive strategy and standard hosted needs.

AutoGrant Enterprise

Enterprise may fit a larger impact company, portfolio, regulated organization, or organization requiring customer-controlled deployment, integration, multiple operating groups, or a wider grant-capacity transformation.

Social-impact companies

FAQ

Eligibility depends on the specific program and applicant rules. AutoGrant organizes published requirements and potential applicant paths, but the company must verify legal and program eligibility.

Score the opportunity before the company commits to the applicant path.

See eligibility, public-benefit fit, evidence, partners, delivery, competition, restrictions, and strategic value.