The AI-native grant operating system
Know what is worth pursuing. Build the capacity to pursue it.
AutoGrant™ finds funding that fits your mission, helps your team decide what's worth pursuing, and carries approved work from application through award reporting, with your people approving every step.
Free. We prepare a funding snapshot for your organization and follow up personally. Nothing is submitted without your approval.
Regional Youth Workforce Innovation Initiative
Eligibility: Confirmed Applicant type and geography meet the published criteria.
- Mission alignment
- 91/100
- Capacity fit
- 72/100
- Competitive position
- 58/100
- Strategic value
- 86/100
Evidence confidence: Moderate Two claims need a source before drafting.
Verdict: Pursue with conditions
Proceed after confirming the data owner, strengthening the employer partnership, and documenting the required match.
Human approval required
Nothing is submitted without explicit sign-off.
Built in your voice
Drafts use your approved organizational context, evidence, and prior work.
Your data stays yours
Customer content is not used to train shared AI models or another customer's workspace.
Full grant lifecycle
Discovery, decision, application, stewardship, reporting, and renewal stay connected.
Start with discovery
See which funding opportunities may fit your organization.
Share your organization's website or describe what you are trying to fund. We use your mission, programs, geography, priorities, and available evidence to prepare a preliminary funding snapshot for you to evaluate.
Initial results are preliminary. Every opportunity must be confirmed against the funder's current eligibility rules, requirements, and source materials.
What a snapshot answers
- Which public and private programs may align with your mission and geography
- The preliminary applicant-type or eligibility signal for each
- Why an opportunity may fit, and what must be confirmed before pursuit
- The source and last-checked date, so you can verify every fact
Free to start. A preliminary match is not an award prediction, and discovery is the beginning of the record, not the whole operation.
Where a grant list stops
A list tells you what exists. AutoGrant helps you decide what deserves your time and gives you the capacity to do it.
You rarely lack opportunities. You lack the time to vet them and the people to carry the right ones from application to award reporting. Here is what each kind of tool leaves on your desk.
- Grant database
- Shows you what exists. Your team still has to work out fit, readiness, priority, and next steps, one opportunity at a time.
- Generic AI chat
- Helps you write text, but it does not keep the context, decisions, owners, approvals, and deadlines around the work.
- AutoGrant
- Gives you a pursuit decision you can inspect, then carries approved work through one connected record, from application to award reporting and renewal. Drafts sound like you, answer what the funder asked, and are checked by a person before anything goes out.
The goal is not more applications. It is more of the right pursuits and fewer expensive mistakes.
How the work gets done
AI handles the volume. People own the judgment.
AutoGrant carries each grant from discovery to renewal on one record. AI does the research, structure and drafting. Your people own strategy, relationships and approval.
Watch AutoGrant work
One grant record. Specialized agents. Select a stage to see the work.
Specialized agents
Organization Intelligence · Grant Scout · Funder Intelligence · Matchmaking
See more of the field without creating a longer list of homework.
Human checkpoint: your team confirms which channels and funders AutoGrant watches on your behalf.
Opportunity pipeline
14 opportunities surfaced this cycle, ranked by fit
Ranked by mission alignment, funder history, and available capacity, not just keyword match.
Shared institutional context: feeds every stage above
One connected record
One record for every grant, from first match to final report.
Every pursuit adds to what your organization knows: why you pursued it or passed, who approved the work, what you submitted, what the funder decided, and what the award requires. Every deadline, owner, and funder conversation stays on that record, so nothing depends on one person's inbox.
01Discover
Find public and relationship-driven opportunities aligned to mission, programs, geography, track record, and capacity.
02Decide
Confirm eligibility, evaluate competitive fit, identify risks, and document the go/no-go rationale.
03Build
Convert requirements into a plan, assign inputs, draft in the organization's voice, and review against the funder's criteria.
04Submit
Assemble the complete package, verify requirements, and route final submission through explicit human approval.
05Steward
Turn the award into obligations, owners, milestones, documentation, and reporting dates.
06Renew
Preserve funder history, outcomes, reports, and lessons so the next application begins stronger.
Most tools stop at submission. The award is where your obligations begin.
Compliance, reporting dates, budget monitoring, funder relationships, and renewal stay in the same record as the decision and the application, so your next proposal starts from evidence, not a blank page.
The decision before the draft
A match is a possibility. AI Judge determines whether it deserves pursuit.
AI Judge assesses six dimensions: eligibility as a threshold, four scored dimensions, and the confidence of your evidence. It exposes readiness gaps and risks, and shows what must become true before you commit scarce capacity.
- Eligibility and threshold requirementsThreshold
- Mission and program alignmentScored
- Delivery and reporting capacityScored
- Competitive positionScored
- Strategic value and opportunity costScored
- Evidence confidence and readiness conditionsAssessed
A well-supported no-go is a valuable result. It protects your capacity for work with a stronger path to impact and funding.
Regional Youth Workforce Innovation Initiative
Eligibility: Confirmed Applicant type and geography meet the published criteria.
- Mission alignment
- 91/100
- Capacity fit
- 72/100
- Competitive position
- 58/100
- Strategic value
- 86/100
The funder's youth-workforce priority maps directly to the organization's core program and outcomes.
Delivery is credible, but quarterly reporting needs a named data owner.
Strong local partnerships, with a field likely to include larger prior grantees.
A win would establish evidence and funder history for a larger multi-year opportunity.
Evidence confidence: Moderate Two claims need a source before drafting.
Verdict: Pursue with conditions
Proceed after confirming the data owner, strengthening the employer partnership, and documenting the required match.
Evaluate the work
Do not buy the promise. Inspect the decision and operating artifacts.
AutoGrant is designed to produce work that your grants leader, program owner, finance reviewer, executive, or auditor can inspect. Samples stay clearly labeled until real customer evidence can be published accurately and with permission.
Community Health Workforce Expansion: 47 requirements extracted
| Requirement | Source | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Audit (2 CFR 200.501) for most recent fiscal year | § IV.B.3 | Finance | Complete |
| Letters of commitment from each named partner | § IV.B.7 | Program | Not started |
| Non-federal match, 25% of total project cost | § III.B | Finance | At risk |
| Logic model with measurable outputs and outcomes | § IV.C.1 | Program | In progress |
| Data management plan covering participant records | § IV.C.4 | IT | Not started |
| SAM.gov registration active through close date | § III.A | Finance | Complete |
Showing 6 of 47. Every requirement links back to the paragraph it came from.
Ineligible: do not pursue
Applicants must be a unit of local government or a federally recognized tribe. A 501(c)(3) may participate only as a named subrecipient.
Found in § III.A, Eligible Applicants. Flagged before drafting began.
What would change this
- Apply as a subrecipient under the county health department.
- Wait for the FY27 cycle, which opens the direct-applicant category.
Caught on day one. Roughly 60 hours of drafting not spent.
Submission gate: approval required before anything is filed
- Every factual claim traced to a source document· Program lead
- Budget totals reconcile to the narrative· Finance
- Match commitment confirmed in writing· Finance· outstanding
- Voice matches the organization's prior submissions· Development
Blocked until a named person approves. AutoGrant does not submit on its own.
Choose the operating model
Start with the capacity gap. Match the operating model to the organization.
Some teams need a guided hosted workspace. Others need a managed, organization-wide capability with integrations, governance, and implementation support. AutoGrant Enterprise is the flagship commercial model.
AutoGrant Enterprise
Organization-wide grant intelligence and operating capacity.
Combine AutoGrant's decision and lifecycle system with your organization's workflows, named oversight, integrations, and governance.
Runs in our hosted environment or yours.
AutoGrant Platform
Hosted by AutoGrant. Run by your team.
A guided organization workspace for teams that want a governed grant lifecycle without customer-controlled deployment.
AutoGrant for Consultants
A professional operating system for distinct client grant pipelines.
Preserve each client's context, voice, evidence, approvals, and reporting history while increasing repeatable professional delivery capacity.
What it costs
Grant discovery is free. AutoGrant Platform and AutoGrant Enterprise are priced after a short fit review, based on the scope and value of the work. AutoGrant never charges per seat, per application, or by usage, and never takes a percentage of your awards.
Different funding environments
The capacity gap changes by organization. The operating discipline does not.
AutoGrant adapts eligibility, evidence, readiness, workflow, governance, and stewardship to the organization's funding environment while preserving one connected decision and operating record.
Nonprofits
Protect limited development capacity and coordinate program, finance, evidence, and review.
ExploreLocal government
Evaluate project readiness, match, approvals, procurement, delivery, and public accountability.
ExploreRural hospitals and community health
Pursue complex healthcare, workforce, network, and community funding with a lean team.
ExploreResearch institutions and universities
Connect sponsor fit, investigators, budgets, routing, compliance, and resubmission history.
ExploreStartups and SBIR/STTR
Map roadmap milestones to non-dilutive funding and separate real topic fit from keyword fit.
ExploreVenture funds and accelerators
Map portfolio-company milestones to strategically aligned non-dilutive capital across the portfolio.
ExploreFAQ
The questions most teams ask first.
Built with real grant teams
Early, active, and transparent about the evidence.
AutoGrant is in active early adoption. Organizations across nonprofit, healthcare, government, research, and innovation are using the system to build pipelines, evaluate opportunities, develop applications, and manage the work.
Grant outcomes arrive on funder timelines. We publish award results only after decisions are complete and customers approve the story. Until then, we prove the product through real workflows, real artifacts, transparent controls, and work you can evaluate before making a larger commitment.
Start with the funding. Build the capability when the value is clear.
Discover funding that may fit your organization, or score one real pursuit and see how AutoGrant reaches a decision.