The complete AutoGrant™ product

One operating system for the decisions, work, and obligations behind every grant.

AutoGrant connects the people, evidence, requirements, documents, deadlines, approvals, and institutional memory across the complete grant lifecycle. It begins with what your organization is trying to fund, helps determine which opportunities are worth pursuing, and carries approved opportunities through application, submission readiness, stewardship, reporting, and renewal.

See AI Judge on a real opportunity Explore the grant lifecycle

Product overview

One connected record

Organizational profile
Approved context, evidence, and constraints
Scored opportunity
AI Judge
A go/no-go rationale the team can inspect
Requirements plan
Every requirement with an owner and a date
Proposal
Drafts mapped to the funder’s questions
Submission readiness
Complete, consistent, human-authorized
Award obligations
Milestones, reports, and renewal dates

Each stage produces structured information the next stage can use.

Capability status

Know what is core, configured, or Enterprise-dependent.

AutoGrant confirms the exact current capability set during the fit review rather than presenting planned work as live. The operating model is grouped this way:

Core workflow reviewed during fit

Organizational context, AI Judge, requirements, proposal workflow, human review, submission readiness, stewardship, and renewal.

Configured during onboarding

Approved sources, organizational evidence, roles, review gates, templates, priorities, and operating policies.

Enterprise-dependent

Dedicated or customer-controlled deployment, customer identity, deeper integrations, and organization-specific governance.

Product model

Discover. Decide. Build. Submit. Steward. Renew.

AutoGrant is not a disconnected set of AI prompts. Each stage produces structured information that the next stage can use.

A pursued opportunity becomes a requirements plan.
Requirements become assignments, evidence requests, narrative sections, budgets, and reviews.
The final proposal becomes a record of commitments.
An award becomes an obligation calendar.
Reports and feedback become stronger context for the next pursuit.

Organizational context

Give AutoGrant approved context before asking it to create work.

The organizational profile can include:

People review and approve the source material. AutoGrant uses that context within the customer’s workspace to support matching, scoring, drafting, and continuity.

Mission, history, and strategic priorities
Programs and fundable initiatives
Populations and geographies served
Outcomes, evidence, and evaluation practices
Leadership and delivery capacity
Partnerships and letters of support
Prior grants, proposals, reports, and feedback
Approved language, facts, and financial context
Registrations, classifications, and eligibility attributes
Constraints, exclusions, and approval policies

Before the application

Funding strategy and discovery

Structure fundable priorities

Translate organizational goals into clear initiatives, expected outcomes, readiness needs, funding categories, and a relationship plan.

Build the opportunity pipeline

Bring together public opportunities, known funders, relationship-driven prospects, and opportunities entered by the team.

Prioritize the work

Separate immediate pursuits from readiness work, relationship cultivation, monitoring, and deliberate no-go decisions.

AI Judge

A list tells you what exists. AI Judge helps determine what deserves your time.

For each opportunity, AI Judge can organize:

Eligibility and threshold requirements
Mission and program alignment
Delivery and reporting capacity
Competitive strengths and weaknesses
Evidence and partnership gaps
Match and financial implications
Strategic value and opportunity cost
Confidence in the available evidence
Conditions required before pursuit

The team can inspect sources, challenge assumptions, add context, and record its final decision.

Explore AI Judge

During the application

Requirements and proposal

Writing is the visible work. AutoGrant structures everything the writing depends on.

Parse the solicitation
Extract every question, attachment, page limit, format, budget item, registration, deadline, dependency, and review requirement.
Build the work plan
Assign owners, source evidence, dependencies, reviewers, and due dates before writing becomes the bottleneck.
Draft to the criteria
Create structured drafts grounded in approved organizational context and mapped to the funder’s questions and review rubric.
Coordinate review
Route facts, program commitments, outcomes, budget, compliance, and narrative through the appropriate people.
Check completeness and consistency
Flag missing answers, unsupported claims, inconsistent numbers, stale evidence, unaddressed criteria, and unresolved approvals.

Writing quality

Drafts that sound like you and answer what the funder asked.

Your team starts from a structured draft mapped to the funder’s criteria, not a blank page.

In your voice: Built from your past proposals and approved organizational facts, not a generic template.
Mapped to the funder’s requirements: Every section traces back to the solicitation, the way the sample requirements matrix shows.
Checked by a person before it goes out: Facts and citations carry their source, and a person reviews them before anything is submitted.

Before submission

Submission readiness

AutoGrant can assemble and verify the complete package, maintain the final record, and support approved workflow or portal steps where enabled.

AI handles the volume. People own the judgment.

A named person remains responsible for final authorization. AutoGrant cannot independently commit the organization to a scope, budget, partnership, performance measure, legal representation, or final submission.

After the award

Post-award and renewal

Convert promises into obligations

Create owners, milestones, outcomes, reporting dates, documentation requirements, and financial obligations from the award and final proposal.

Prepare reports from approved evidence

Organize progress, results, financial data, challenges, changes, and narrative using verified sources.

Preserve funder history

Keep communications, reports, feedback, decisions, and lessons connected to the funder and program.

Begin renewal before the deadline

Surface the evidence, relationship work, program changes, and readiness actions needed for the next cycle.

Your grant pipeline

See every grant you’re pursuing, writing, waiting on, and reporting on.

One view of your whole portfolio: what’s due, who owns it, what the funder decided, and what comes next. Deadlines, reporting dates, and renewals stop living in spreadsheets and inboxes.

Every grant shows its stage and the next step, so work does not stall while someone waits to be asked.

Every grant has an owner and a deadline, so you can see who is carrying what and what is due first.

After an award, reports, deliverables, and renewal dates stay on the same record as the application.

Grant pipelineIllustrative · sample data

Every active grant, from pursuit decision to renewal

Stage	Grant	Owner	Next step	Next date
Deciding	Rural Broadband Access Planning Grant	Grants lead	Review the scorecard and record a pursuit decision	Decision byOct 9
Drafting	Youth Workforce Pathways Initiative	Program director	Finish the evaluation plan section for review	Section dueOct 21
Submitted	Community Health Workforce Expansion	Grants lead	Wait for the funder decision and log any questions	Decision expectedDec 1
Awarded: reporting due	Regional Food Access Partnership	Finance	Prepare the interim financial report	Report dueNov 3
Awarded: reporting due	Early Literacy Expansion Fund	Program manager	Compile outcome data for the annual report	Report dueNov 18
Renewal	Senior Transportation Services Grant	Development director	Confirm renewal plans with the program officer	Renewal opensJan 12

DecidingDecision by Oct 9
Rural Broadband Access Planning Grant
Owner:
Grants lead
Next:
Review the scorecard and record a pursuit decision
DraftingSection due Oct 21
Youth Workforce Pathways Initiative
Owner:
Program director
Next:
Finish the evaluation plan section for review
SubmittedDecision expected Dec 1
Community Health Workforce Expansion
Owner:
Grants lead
Next:
Wait for the funder decision and log any questions
Awarded: reporting dueReport due Nov 3
Regional Food Access Partnership
Owner:
Finance
Next:
Prepare the interim financial report
Awarded: reporting dueReport due Nov 18
Early Literacy Expansion Fund
Owner:
Program manager
Next:
Compile outcome data for the annual report
RenewalRenewal opens Jan 12
Senior Transportation Services Grant
Owner:
Development director
Next:
Confirm renewal plans with the program officer

Each row is one record: the decision, the application, the award terms, and the funder history.

Does AutoGrant replace our CRM or grants management system?

AutoGrant is the grant intelligence and operating-workflow layer. It may reduce spreadsheets, document chaos, disconnected AI chats, and manual trackers. Official finance, research, procurement, document, CRM, or submission systems may remain authoritative.

Every funder relationship, with its full history.

Program officer contacts, past applications and outcomes, reviewer feedback, reporting commitments, and the next step in the relationship, kept on one record so it survives staff changes.

AutoGrant prepares

A funder brief before every call
A reminder when a report or check-in is due
The history behind each past decision

Your people own

The conversations
The commitments
The relationship itself

A stewardship rhythm after every award

After an award, AutoGrant sets stewardship check-ins at day 1, 7, 14, 30, and 90. Your team decides what each conversation covers.

Day 1
Day 7
Day 14
Day 30
Day 90

For leadership

Visibility

Leaders should be able to see:

What the organization is trying to fund
Which opportunities are being considered
Why each pursuit decision was made
What work is blocked
What remains before submission
Which obligations are approaching
Where evidence or capacity is weak
What should change before renewal

Human + AI

Product boundaries

AutoGrant can research, structure, draft, compare, check, and coordinate.

See how humans and AI divide the work

People remain responsible for:

Strategy and priorities
Funder and partner relationships
Facts, evidence, and interpretation
Program design and commitments
Budgets and financial representations
Legal, regulatory, and institutional determinations
Ethics and disclosure
Final approval and submission

Where it fits

One operating system, applied to your organization.

Bring one opportunity. See the complete operating model.

Start with AI Judge, then see how an approved pursuit becomes requirements, assignments, a proposal, a review record, a submission package, and an obligation calendar.

See AI Judge on a real opportunity Score a real grant