AutoGrant™ Enterprise
A complete grant operating capability, deployed in your environment.
Add grant capacity across your organization without adding proportional headcount: your workflows, approvals and data, with AutoGrant doing the research, drafting and coordination.
- Environment
- Dedicated or customer-controlled
- Operated by AutoGrant, or in an environment your team controls.
- Scope
- Organization-wide internal use
- Not priced by seats, applications, or usage.
- Commercial model
- Value-based annual license
- Scope documented before implementation.
Capability areas in scope
- Decide and build6 capabilities
- Steward and govern5 capabilities
- Deploy and enable5 capabilities
Human authorization is required before any submission. AutoGrant guarantees the work named in the SOW, never an award.
Dedicated or customer-controlled deployment
Run AutoGrant in a dedicated environment or your own.
Organization-wide internal use
Broad authorized use within the agreed scope.
Human approval at every critical step
Preparation and authorization remain separate.
Value-based commercial model
Terms tied to the value created, not seats or usage.
Grant capacity
The conventional answer is more headcount. The operating answer is more capability.
A complete grants function may require strategy, research, funder intelligence, proposal development, finance, compliance, project management, quality review, reporting, and renewal. Many organizations cannot justify every role; established teams may already be saturated.
Enterprise works in both directions. It gives an organization a credible grant-operating capability it could not otherwise afford or recruit in full, and it helps an established team evaluate, develop, and manage more high-quality work.
People retain strategy, program ownership, relationships, evidence, finance, approval, and accountability.
Commercial model
Tie the commercial model to value created, not to how widely the capability is adopted.
AutoGrant Enterprise is licensed organization-wide within the agreed operating and contractual boundary. Scope defines responsibilities and support; it does not become a consumption meter.
As a directional reference, managed AutoGrant Enterprise engagements are typically six figures annually, plus implementation. Strategic and customer-controlled cloud programs are scoped separately. AutoGrant does not publish a detailed rate card—final terms follow the value case and scope confirmed during the fit review.
Not metered by
- Seats or named users
- Applications or departments
- Prompts, generated words, or tokens
- Adoption or usage true-ups
- A percentage of grants awarded
Broad adoption should improve the return, not trigger penalties.
Based on conservative recurring value
- Grant capability the organization would otherwise need to build
- FTE-equivalent capacity created for the existing team
- Hiring avoided or responsibly deferred
- Outside research, writing, or consulting spend reduced
- Administrative rework and coordination cost reduced
- Institutional knowledge and continuity preserved
- Deadline, reporting, and operating risk reduced where measurable
Additional grants won are upside. They are not required to justify the base economic case.
A conservative, defensible value case
We count documented capacity gains, avoided cost, and operational improvements once. Speculative awards and overlapping benefits are excluded from the base case.
What Enterprise includes
A licensed product deployment, implemented around your organization.
The final scope is documented before implementation. Subject to that agreement, Enterprise can combine capabilities from three capability areas.
Decide and build
- Organizational grant intelligence profile
- Fundable initiatives and funding strategy
- Opportunity pipeline and AI Judge
- Requirements extraction and work planning
- Proposal, evidence, budget, and review workflow
- Submission readiness and final human authorization
Steward and govern
- Post-award obligations, reporting, and renewal
- Organization-specific roles and approval gates
- Decision, review, and authorization records
- Portfolio and operating visibility
- Value and outcome review
Deploy and enable
- Dedicated or supported customer-controlled deployment
- Identity, data, and approved document connections
- Architecture and data-flow documentation
- Release, support, and operating procedures
- Training and capability transfer
How it works
Prove the operating value before broad deployment.
The engagement is structured around real work, named responsibilities, explicit acceptance measures, and a clear transition into ongoing operation.
Step 1
Assess
Define the grant capability, current constraints, retained human responsibilities, conservative value, deployment requirements, and fit.
Step 2
Prove
Use real opportunities and workflows to demonstrate AI Judge, requirements, review, security, and operating value against agreed acceptance measures.
Step 3
Deploy
Configure the approved environment, workflow, identity, data boundaries, integrations, governance, support, and release process.
Step 4
Transfer and improve
Train internal owners, document responsibilities, confirm acceptance, and review operating value and priorities over time without usage penalties.
Deployment and ownership
Run AutoGrant in a dedicated environment or a supported environment you control.
The architecture, data boundaries, identity, logging, release process, support responsibilities, and ownership terms are documented for the selected model.
Dedicated AutoGrant-operated environment
Customer-specific application and data resources with agreed isolation, access, release, monitoring, support, backup, and recovery responsibilities.
Customer-controlled environment
AutoGrant deployed into a supported customer cloud or approved infrastructure with an explicit shared-responsibility model.
Deployment in a customer environment can align AutoGrant with the customer’s identity, networking, logging, residency, and governance controls. It does not automatically make the application compliant with every requirement.
Customer owns
- Customer data and documents
- Customer-specific outputs
- Customer organizational profile
- Agreed customer-specific configuration and integrations
- Resources, logs, and operating records in the customer environment
AutoGrant retains
- AutoGrant core software
- Reusable agent and orchestration framework
- AI Judge methodology
- General-purpose workflows and product updates
- Generic improvements and reusable intellectual property
Fit
Where Enterprise is a strong fit, and where Platform is the better answer.
Strong Enterprise fit
- Grants are strategically and economically meaningful.
- The organization has recurring opportunity and a named executive sponsor.
- Program, finance, evidence, and approval owners can participate.
- Deployment, integration, or governance needs justify Enterprise.
- The conservative value case supports a dedicated implementation.
- The organization is willing to prove the workflow on real work.
Not a strong Enterprise fit
- The primary request is inexpensive autonomous writing.
- No one can own decisions, evidence, relationships, finances, or approvals.
- The buyer expects guaranteed awards or an award-contingent fee.
- The value case cannot support a dedicated implementation.
- The hosted Platform already meets the requirement.
When Platform is the better path, we will say so.
Security and procurement
Security review is a named workstream, not a late-stage surprise.
Two documents are ready for your security team now. The rest is prepared with you for the deployment model you select.
Available on request now
- Security overview document
- Completed security questionnaire
Designed per engagement
- Architecture and data-flow documentation
- Data-processing terms
- Subprocessors for the selected deployment
- Identity and access design
- Customer-environment responsibility matrix
- Retention and deletion design
- Logging and incident responsibilities
- Accessibility documentation
- Responsible-AI controls
- Procurement and acceptance criteria
Success measures
Success is measured on operating value, not only awards.
Measures are agreed during assessment. Candidates fall into four groups.
Decision speed and quality
- Time from opportunity to go/no-go decision
- Opportunities screened
- No-go decisions made before writing
- Missing or inconsistent requirements found
Capacity returned
- Requirements extracted
- Time to an initial complete draft
- Review completion
- Applications supported
- Capacity returned to senior staff
Spend and hiring
- Outside spend reduced
- Hiring deferred
Obligations and continuity
- Reporting and renewal obligations surfaced
- User adoption and workflow consistency
- Institutional knowledge preserved
Award outcomes may be tracked as long-term evidence but should not be treated as a guaranteed deliverable.
FAQ
Enterprise questions, answered.
Enterprise inquiry
Explore an Enterprise deployment.
Start with a fit and value conversation around real opportunities, current team capacity, workflow, governance, and deployment requirements.
Want to see the decision quality first?
Share one public solicitation and your organization’s website. We will prepare a preliminary scorecard and walk through it with you in a working session.